Semper Reformanda, Isn’t Simple - David Lauten





Today, October 31, 2020, we remember 503 years ago when German monk, Martin Luther, nailed his Ninety-five Theses to the door of All Saints’ Church in Wittenberg which sparked the Reformation. It was a time of the rediscovery of the gospel of Christ, the authority of the Word of God and the centrality of preaching and teaching the Scriptures. The gospel of salvation in Christ alone through faith alone transformed the lives of many as God’s Word spread across Europe. The newly recovered gospel not only impacted individuals but brought about renovation of worship according to Scripture. And this resulted in an eventual over-haul of gospel ministry and church structures.

But today is not just a day to look back on what God did through the Reformation. It is a time to examine our own priorities and carefully consider our need for continual reformation, renewal and revival. 

Recently, a friend and I were discussing one of the slogans of the Reformation that were developed over 100 years after Luther, semper reformanda - always reforming. Overhearing our conversation, his 6-year-old son told a sibling, “that sounds simple.” My friend responded, “semper reformanda, isn’t simple.”

The church and those who make it up are called to continual reform. A later Reformer, John Calvinspells out our constant need for continual gospel re-tooling describing “the human heart is a perpetual idol factory.” Revamping our lives and Christ’s church according to God’s Word is never easy. While it is not simple, the Reformation begun by that German monk those many years ago continues.

The history of Christ’s Church is marked both by the need for renewal and God’s gracious provision of semper reformanda. The history of the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church is no exception. The establishment of the Associate Presbytery in 1733 with an emphasis on Christians selecting their Pastors and the free offer of the gospel brought needed corrective to the Church of Scotland at that time. Ten years later, members of the Reformed Presbytery emphasizing the crown rights of Jesus as the head of his Church sought biblical reform from Church of Scotland government tangled with the monarchy.

In more recent years, efforts to reform Christ’s Church continue. At last week’s ARP Synod Meeting, Elders and Ministers present made a commitment to study restructuring and reorganizing the ARP Synod for gospel effectiveness and ministry optimization. 

We yearn for God to change us that our lives may continually be altered by his Word and gospel that we may live for his glory. We also pray and labor for the re-ordering of our Church and congregations for continual reform according to the Scriptures. 

But none of this is simple. Reformation in our individual lives and in our life together as God’s people is not easy. Our tendency individually and corporately is to resist change. The present, even lived less stellar than desired, is often more comfortable than living life devoted to God. While gospel renovation is not simple, it is what is needed.

The first question of our Shorter Catechism gets to the heart of the matter. When God brings renewal, our minds and hearts are re-oriented for living for his glory and finding our enjoyment in him. 

May God return us to our first love of Christ and the gospel privilege of living life based upon our union with Christ. Our enjoyment of fellowship and communion with our Triune God is among the highest of gospel privileges.

 

On this day of Reformation, may the upshot of semper reformanda in our lives be Christ our heart-treasure and the gospel our true pearl of great price. 

 

While the arm of the flesh and trusting in princes or horses will fail us, we know God is able to bring spiritual refreshment. So there is much about which we are hopeful. God brought reformation, renewal, and revival of his church to yester-year. May God do it again!

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Make Our Worship Spaces Presbyterian Again by Rev. Benjamin Glaser

Image
We’ve all heard the jokes about Presbyterian’s being anti-fun, the so-called frozen chosen. The seen, but not heard denomination. The post you are about to read is going to sound like it came from the official spokesman of the “Presbyterians against anything nice” coalition. Maybe it’s true, maybe I am the grumpiest Presbyterian alive, but my goal here today is not to get hits or cause trouble. Rabble rousers are boring people. Men who seek out controversy don’t have enough to do and they aren’t really seeking to win converts to their position. They just like to see the fight.  At the end of the day I’m really a harmless little fuzzball who just wants Presbyterians to be Presbyterians, Baptists to be Baptists, and Anglicans to be Anglicans. Good fences make good neighbors. If you know where the other person stands it makes it easier to know where you stand. The topic I’d like to get into today is about the meeting space. Some call it the “sanctuary”, others the “preaching hall”, ...
Read more

What Does the ARP Confess About the Civil Government? by Rev. Benjamin Glaser

Image
A common problem in our conservative Presbyterian circles is that some members of the PCA believe they not only invented American presbyterianism, but that they and the OPC are the only actual members of the party. One way their aloofness shows itself is through an unwillingness to recognize that not all of us descend from the 1729 Adopting Act nor gauge our history through Francis Makemie or the Philadelphia Assembly of 1789. When Makemie established the first presbytery in the American colonies in 1709 some of us were still in Scotland, both in and out of the revolution settlement CoS. Ebenezer Erskine was a spry twenty-nine years old and Alexander Moncrieff was fourteen. The years 1782 and 1803 are relevant to our history in ways the other dates are not. We are not overly concerned with what the mainliners were up to in those days. We’ve been blessedly free from that mess for two hundred twenty plus years. The reason why I bring that up is because the folks who think they hung the m...
Read more

Ralph Erskine and Mental Images by Rev. Benjamin Glaser

Image
  One of the most common exceptions taken in the ARP (and the PCA  et al ) by newly ordained men and those taking transfer exams in presbytery is without a doubt a certain clause in the explanation to Westminster Larger Catechism #109. This mainly concerns the prohibition against making mental images of the Godhead, especially the Second Person, in accordance with the catechism’s teaching on the Second Commandment. I will post the question below: Q. 109.  What sins are forbidden in the second commandment? A. The sins forbidden in the second commandment are, all devising, counseling, commanding, using, and any wise approving, any religious worship not instituted by God himself; the making any representation of God, of all or of any of the three persons, either inwardly in our mind, or outwardly in any kind of image or likeness of any creature whatsoever; all worshiping of it, or God in it or by it; the making of any representation of feigned deities, and all worship of the...
Read more