The Faithfulness of the Lion - Mike Chipman

 



During the persecution of Marcus Aurelius, around 170 AD, there lived a girl named Blandine. Blandine was a 15-year-old girl. She was a Christian slave - and she,along with other Christians, was arrested for their faith. She was tortured so horribly that it was said of her tormentors “they did not know what more they could do to her.” Her fellow believers attempted to shield her from the torture because she was small and frail, but over and over she confessed “I am a Christian” Eventually they tied her to a stake and set wild beasts on her - but according to legend, the wild beasts wouldn’t touch her. Daniel 6 gives us a similar story. We have another believer set before wild beasts - and like the story from church history, the beasts would not touch him. It’s a story we’ve all heard - of Daniel and the lions' den - and how God shut the mouths of the lions. If we aren’t careful with this text, we might find yet another reason to make Daniel the hero. While Daniel is to be commended for his faith and that he was found blameless before God - Daniel is not the hero.

When Daniel was thrown into the lion's den, he was probably around 70-80 years old. He was thrown in with some reluctance, but thrown in nonetheless, to satisfy some nonsense edict. Then God saved him. The Lord sent an angel to shut the lion's mouth. Why? Because Daniel was found blameless before God and King Darius (6:22). We get that again in 6:23 - no harm came to him “because he had trusted in his God.” Only a living God shuts the mouths of lions. Delivers. Rescues. Works signs and wonders. And has the power to save. And hopefully, that is where we stop. Because many keep going, saying, “Has the power to save… if we are faithful to him like Daniel. Or Noah. Or Abraham. Or David. 

Blandine was faithful. She endured torture that manyothers had already succumbed to. She was presented to beasts, but they wouldn’t touch her. So, they placed her on a red-hot grate - then wrapped her up in a net and tossed her to a wild bull. After the bull threw her around, her torturers stabbed her for good measure, sending her to finally be with her Lord Jesus, the Lion of Judah. Blandinewas faithful in a way I can’t comprehend…was tortured and died. Just because we read that God saved Daniel because he had trusted in God - we shouldn’t take from it that it’s our faithfulness that saves us. Our faith is a gift to us. By grace through faith, we are saved - but this is a gift so that no one can boast (Eph 2:8-9). It’s exactly what we see in Daniel’s life. It’s what you see as you read in his prophecy. If there is boasting it is in the Lord.  Though Daniel lived a blameless life - he still needed a Savior. Jesus was his Savior. And Daniel looked forward to Jesus’ day and was glad. 

You do not have to be like Daniel to be saved - or to stay saved. Yet, as people who have been saved, we are called to live a faithful life. A faithful life doesn’t guarantee an easy life. Daniel’s life is a testimony to the fact that while a faithful life doesn’t guarantee freedom from trials, it’s still what we are called to do. Trust in God alone for your salvation - He has saved you. He will continue to do so. And live a life faithful to God and his Word.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Make Our Worship Spaces Presbyterian Again by Rev. Benjamin Glaser

Image
We’ve all heard the jokes about Presbyterian’s being anti-fun, the so-called frozen chosen. The seen, but not heard denomination. The post you are about to read is going to sound like it came from the official spokesman of the “Presbyterians against anything nice” coalition. Maybe it’s true, maybe I am the grumpiest Presbyterian alive, but my goal here today is not to get hits or cause trouble. Rabble rousers are boring people. Men who seek out controversy don’t have enough to do and they aren’t really seeking to win converts to their position. They just like to see the fight.  At the end of the day I’m really a harmless little fuzzball who just wants Presbyterians to be Presbyterians, Baptists to be Baptists, and Anglicans to be Anglicans. Good fences make good neighbors. If you know where the other person stands it makes it easier to know where you stand. The topic I’d like to get into today is about the meeting space. Some call it the “sanctuary”, others the “preaching hall”, ...
Read more

What Does the ARP Confess About the Civil Government? by Rev. Benjamin Glaser

Image
A common problem in our conservative Presbyterian circles is that some members of the PCA believe they not only invented American presbyterianism, but that they and the OPC are the only actual members of the party. One way their aloofness shows itself is through an unwillingness to recognize that not all of us descend from the 1729 Adopting Act nor gauge our history through Francis Makemie or the Philadelphia Assembly of 1789. When Makemie established the first presbytery in the American colonies in 1709 some of us were still in Scotland, both in and out of the revolution settlement CoS. Ebenezer Erskine was a spry twenty-nine years old and Alexander Moncrieff was fourteen. The years 1782 and 1803 are relevant to our history in ways the other dates are not. We are not overly concerned with what the mainliners were up to in those days. We’ve been blessedly free from that mess for two hundred twenty plus years. The reason why I bring that up is because the folks who think they hung the m...
Read more

Ralph Erskine and Mental Images by Rev. Benjamin Glaser

Image
  One of the most common exceptions taken in the ARP (and the PCA  et al ) by newly ordained men and those taking transfer exams in presbytery is without a doubt a certain clause in the explanation to Westminster Larger Catechism #109. This mainly concerns the prohibition against making mental images of the Godhead, especially the Second Person, in accordance with the catechism’s teaching on the Second Commandment. I will post the question below: Q. 109.  What sins are forbidden in the second commandment? A. The sins forbidden in the second commandment are, all devising, counseling, commanding, using, and any wise approving, any religious worship not instituted by God himself; the making any representation of God, of all or of any of the three persons, either inwardly in our mind, or outwardly in any kind of image or likeness of any creature whatsoever; all worshiping of it, or God in it or by it; the making of any representation of feigned deities, and all worship of the...
Read more